{"id":1323,"date":"2025-11-07T11:17:02","date_gmt":"2025-11-07T08:17:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wordpress.habereditoru.com\/?p=1323"},"modified":"2025-11-07T11:17:02","modified_gmt":"2025-11-07T08:17:02","slug":"gezi-davasinda-aymden-tartismali-karar-mahkeme-karsi-cikti-aym-super-temyiz-yeri-degil","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wordpress.habereditoru.com\/?p=1323","title":{"rendered":"Gezi davas\u0131nda AYM’den tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 karar! Mahkeme kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131: AYM s\u00fcper temyiz yeri de\u011fil"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\u0130stanbul 13. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi<\/strong>, Gezi Park\u0131 davas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda tutuklu bulunan Tayfun Kahraman <\/strong>hakk\u0131nda Anayasa Mahkemesi<\/strong>\u2019nin verdi\u011fi \u201chak ihlali<\/em>\u201d karar\u0131na direndi. Mahkeme, yeniden yarg\u0131lama talebini reddetti.<\/p>\n

Mahkeme, Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019nin karar\u0131n\u0131n yeniden yarg\u0131lama gerektirmedi\u011fi ve esas incelemenin ola\u011fan yarg\u0131 yollar\u0131nda yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurdu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n

AYM \u0130LE YEREL MAHKEME ARASINDA ‘YETK\u0130’ GER\u0130L\u0130M\u0130<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

Anayasa Mahkemesi, Ekim ay\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131nda, Tayfun Kahraman\u2019\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine h\u00fckmetmi\u015fti.<\/em><\/p>\n

AYM karar\u0131nda, \u201cDelillerin de\u011ferlendirilme bi\u00e7imi ve mahkeme gerek\u00e7elerinin yeterlili\u011fi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ihlal tespiti<\/strong>\u201d yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, dosyan\u0131n yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yerel mahkemeye g\u00f6nderilmesine karar verilmi\u015fti.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u2018BAR\u0130Z HATA VE KEYF\u0130L\u0130K YOK\u2019<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

Ancak \u0130stanbul 13. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, AYM\u2019nin ihlal karar\u0131na ili\u015fkin gerek\u00e7eyi de\u011ferlendirerek yeniden yarg\u0131lama talebini uygun bulmad\u0131.<\/p>\n

Mahkeme karar\u0131nda, Yarg\u0131tay 3. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin ve ilk derece mahkemesinin gerek\u00e7elerinde \u201cbariz takdir hatas\u0131 veya keyfilik<\/strong> bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131<\/strong>\u201d belirtti.<\/p>\n

Kararda \u015fu ifadeler yer ald\u0131:<\/em><\/u><\/p>\n

\n

\u201cGerek mahkememizin gerekse Yarg\u0131tay 3. Ceza Dairesinin kararlar\u0131ndaki detayl\u0131 gerek\u00e7eler dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddialar\u0131n mahkemelerce delillerin de\u011ferlendirilmesi ve hukuk kurallar\u0131n\u0131n yorumlanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin olup mahkeme ve Yarg\u0131tay kararlar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7elerinde bariz takdir hatas\u0131 veya a\u00e7\u0131k bir keyfilik olu\u015fturan bir hususun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

AYM \u2018S\u00dcPER TEMY\u0130Z\u2019 MAHKEMES\u0130 DE\u011e\u0130L<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

\u0130stanbul 13. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, karar\u0131nda ayr\u0131ca Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019nin bireysel ba\u015fvurular kapsam\u0131nda \u201cs\u00fcper temyiz<\/strong>\u201d mercii olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na vurgu yapt\u0131.<\/p>\n

Kararda, AYM\u2019nin kararlar\u0131n\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay ve ilk derece mahkemelerinin takdir yetkisini s\u0131n\u0131rlayamayaca\u011f\u0131, sadece temel hak ihlallerinin tespitiyle s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 inceleme yapabilece\u011fi<\/strong> kaydedildi.<\/p>\n

Mahkeme, bu kapsamda AYM\u2019nin karar\u0131n\u0131n \u201cdelillerin yeniden de\u011ferlendirilmesini gerektiren<\/strong> bir durum olu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131<\/strong>\u201d sonucuna vard\u0131.<\/p>\n

Mahkeme karar\u0131nda \u015fu ifadelere yer verildi:<\/p>\n

\n

\u201c\u0130lk derece mahkemeleri taraf\u0131ndan verilen kararlar\u0131n esas y\u00f6n\u00fcnden adil olup olmamas\u0131, bireysel ba\u015fvuru incelemesine konu olamaz. Anayasa Mahkemesinin g\u00f6revi, Yarg\u0131tay ve ilk derece mahkemelerince yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmelerin ve var\u0131lan sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n hukuka uygunlu\u011funu denetlemek de\u011fildir. Belirli bir davaya ili\u015fkin olarak delilleri de\u011ferIendirme ve g\u00f6sterilmek istenen delilin davayla ilgili olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verme yetkisi esasen ilk derece mahkemelerine aittir. Anayasa Mahkemesine bireysel ba\u015fvuruda, ola\u011fan kanun yollar\u0131nda incelenmesi gereke konularda inceleme ve de\u011ferIendirme yap\u0131lamaz. Zira Anayasa Mahkemesi temyiz veya istinaf mercii de\u011fildir. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u2018s\u00fcper temyiz\u2019 mahkemesi de de\u011fildir.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\u2018AYM\u2019N\u0130N YAPTI\u011eI YETK\u0130 GASPI\u2019<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, karar\u0131nda ayr\u0131ca AYM\u2019nin bireysel ba\u015fvuru kararlar\u0131yla yarg\u0131lama mercilerinin yetki alan\u0131na girdi\u011fini belirterek, bunun \u201cyetki gasp\u0131<\/strong>\u201d niteli\u011finde oldu\u011funu savundu.<\/p>\n

Metinde, Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019nin \u201cyarg\u0131laman\u0131n esas\u0131na ili\u015fkin konularda karar veremeyece\u011finin<\/strong>\u201d alt\u0131 \u00e7izildi<\/p>\n

YEN\u0130DEN YARGILAMA YOK, TUTUKLULU\u011eA DEVAM<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

Karar\u0131n sonu\u00e7 b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde; infaz\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n tahliyesi ve yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki taleplerin reddedildi\u011fi belirtildi. Tayfun Kahraman hakk\u0131ndaki 2021\/178 Esas, 2022\/178 say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131n infaz\u0131n\u0131n devam\u0131na h\u00fckmedildi.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

TAYFUN KAHRAMAN K\u0130MD\u0130R?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Tayfun Kahraman, TMMOB \u015eehir Planc\u0131lar\u0131 Odas\u0131 \u0130stanbul \u015eubesi eski ba\u015fkan\u0131 olarak tan\u0131n\u0131yor. 2013 y\u0131l\u0131ndaki Gezi Park\u0131 kalk\u0131\u015fmas\u0131nda Taksim Dayan\u0131\u015fmas\u0131\u2019n\u0131n s\u00f6zc\u00fcleri aras\u0131nda yer ald\u0131.<\/p>\n

Gezi Park\u0131 eylemleriyle ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 davada 25 Nisan 2022 tarihinde \u201ch\u00fck\u00fcmeti ortadan kald\u0131rmaya te\u015febb\u00fcse yard\u0131m<\/strong>\u201d su\u00e7lamas\u0131yla 18 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131. Yartg\u0131ay 3. Ceza Dairesi, Kahraman’a verilen 18 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131 onad\u0131.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Gezi Park\u0131 davas\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcs\u00fc Tayfun Kahraman\u2019\u0131n tutuklulu\u011funun devam\u0131na karar veren yerel mahkeme, tahliye ve infaz\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131 taleplerini, AYM’nin ihlal karar\u0131na ra\u011fmen hukuki zeminde reddetti.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1324,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[1394,1393,1392,1390,1391],"class_list":["post-1323","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-guncel","tag-aymden","tag-davasinda","tag-gezi","tag-istanbul-13-agir-ceza-mahkemesi","tag-tayfun-kahraman"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.habereditoru.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1323","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.habereditoru.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.habereditoru.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.habereditoru.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.habereditoru.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1323"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.habereditoru.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1323\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.habereditoru.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1324"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.habereditoru.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1323"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.habereditoru.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1323"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.habereditoru.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1323"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}